<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The IPv4 Depletion site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com</link>
	<description>Now IPv6 enabled</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:05:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Txv6TF Winter Summit Nov 19-20 in Richardson, TX by Andrew Bower</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=689#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Bower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=689#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>Today all the directors of 6uk, the body formed in the UK to promote IPv6, have resigned claiming they were powerless to encourage IPv6 adoption. They blame the government although I&#039;d like to know what 6uk has been doing itself all this time as the press releases have been scant...

http://www.6uk.org.uk/2012/12/6uk-powerless-to-encourage-ipv6-adoption-board-resigns/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today all the directors of 6uk, the body formed in the UK to promote IPv6, have resigned claiming they were powerless to encourage IPv6 adoption. They blame the government although I&#8217;d like to know what 6uk has been doing itself all this time as the press releases have been scant&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.6uk.org.uk/2012/12/6uk-powerless-to-encourage-ipv6-adoption-board-resigns/" rel="nofollow">http://www.6uk.org.uk/2012/12/6uk-powerless-to-encourage-ipv6-adoption-board-resigns/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Txv6TF Winter Summit Nov 19-20 in Richardson, TX by Michiel</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=689#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>Michiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=689#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>No comments on the event?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comments on the event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIPE in Europe runs dry&#8230; by Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Funny thing is that currently ripe&#039;s buffer is even smaller than apnic&#039;s
People still stick their head in the sand.
Until IPv6-only sites will start to arrive....

Unclear when that will happen, 6 month? 1 year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing is that currently ripe&#8217;s buffer is even smaller than apnic&#8217;s<br />
People still stick their head in the sand.<br />
Until IPv6-only sites will start to arrive&#8230;.</p>
<p>Unclear when that will happen, 6 month? 1 year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIPE in Europe runs dry&#8230; by Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>What has been really interesting is the number and size of IPv6 requests over the last few days.  Some big names have obviously delayed until now have finally got the message that they need to start looking at IPv6.

Yesterday, General Motors and McDonalds got some IPv6 addresses at the EU level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has been really interesting is the number and size of IPv6 requests over the last few days.  Some big names have obviously delayed until now have finally got the message that they need to start looking at IPv6.</p>
<p>Yesterday, General Motors and McDonalds got some IPv6 addresses at the EU level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIPE in Europe runs dry&#8230; by JMV2009</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>JMV2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>No rush is probably a consequence of the 3 month allocation window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No rush is probably a consequence of the 3 month allocation window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DNS when turning on IPv6 by rb12345</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=683#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>rb12345</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=683#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t meant to be a gap, but I think I simply missed that line in my rather quick search through the file.  (Thanks for finding the links to the original RIPE source too!)

My personal assumption though is that there are no missing bits after all, just reassigned space like the Afrinic example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t meant to be a gap, but I think I simply missed that line in my rather quick search through the file.  (Thanks for finding the links to the original RIPE source too!)</p>
<p>My personal assumption though is that there are no missing bits after all, just reassigned space like the Afrinic example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIPE in Europe runs dry&#8230; by Michiel</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>Michiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>What I find remarkable about RIPE depletion, is that there was no last minute rush.

If there had been, my estimate of 10 September might not have been 4 days off. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find remarkable about RIPE depletion, is that there was no last minute rush.</p>
<p>If there had been, my estimate of 10 September might not have been 4 days off. <img src='http://www.ipv4depletion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIPE in Europe runs dry&#8230; by jmv2009</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>jmv2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=685#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Before 2011, there was a clear difference in allocation rate between ARIN and LACNIC. Recently, not so much. Also, ARIN will not stop allocating from the last /8. 

So who knows...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before 2011, there was a clear difference in allocation rate between ARIN and LACNIC. Recently, not so much. Also, ARIN will not stop allocating from the last /8. </p>
<p>So who knows&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DNS when turning on IPv6 by Grahm</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=683#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Grahm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=683#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>rb12345: &quot;delegated&quot; does not have free space. For 1.5 years already there is also an &quot;extended&quot; RIPE file, with free space listed. ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/ 

It&#039;s a good thing to find missing bits and tell RIPE that they lost them. But maybe better do this before they switched to /22 per cust. 

ripencc&#124;GB&#124;ipv4&#124;151.224.0.0&#124;524288&#124;20120809&#124;allocated 
Why is this a gap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rb12345: &#8220;delegated&#8221; does not have free space. For 1.5 years already there is also an &#8220;extended&#8221; RIPE file, with free space listed. <a href="ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/" rel="nofollow">ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/</a> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good thing to find missing bits and tell RIPE that they lost them. But maybe better do this before they switched to /22 per cust. </p>
<p>ripencc|GB|ipv4|151.224.0.0|524288|20120809|allocated<br />
Why is this a gap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DNS when turning on IPv6 by rb12345</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=683#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>rb12345</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=683#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Grahm: I expect the real question about the temporary space /13 was this: why retain the /13 temporary address pool when RIPE has nothing left to allocate/assign except that and the final /8?  The temporary pool is only allocated for short periods (1 month or so for /14, longer with renewals for /13 or smaller), so these can be reclaimed quickly when RIPE eventually needs the addresses.  Using them now would only gain you an extra day or so in the final rush we saw and lose the ability to assign address space to conferences and the like post-depletion.

I could well be wrong, but I expect the data comes from the RIPE delegated prefixes file (mirrored at http://bgp.potaroo.net/stats/ripe/delegated, but there will be an official link somewhere at RIPE) and the IANA equivalent.  If you know the RIR got a /8 from IANA, you can then look for gaps in their allocation records.  Of course, that falls down a bit for the reassigned-to-Afrinic addresses and the temporary pool, and there seem to be gaps in that file regardless (151.224.0.0 for Sky Broadband).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grahm: I expect the real question about the temporary space /13 was this: why retain the /13 temporary address pool when RIPE has nothing left to allocate/assign except that and the final /8?  The temporary pool is only allocated for short periods (1 month or so for /14, longer with renewals for /13 or smaller), so these can be reclaimed quickly when RIPE eventually needs the addresses.  Using them now would only gain you an extra day or so in the final rush we saw and lose the ability to assign address space to conferences and the like post-depletion.</p>
<p>I could well be wrong, but I expect the data comes from the RIPE delegated prefixes file (mirrored at <a href="http://bgp.potaroo.net/stats/ripe/delegated" rel="nofollow">http://bgp.potaroo.net/stats/ripe/delegated</a>, but there will be an official link somewhere at RIPE) and the IANA equivalent.  If you know the RIR got a /8 from IANA, you can then look for gaps in their allocation records.  Of course, that falls down a bit for the reassigned-to-Afrinic addresses and the temporary pool, and there seem to be gaps in that file regardless (151.224.0.0 for Sky Broadband).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
